OPEN READINGS 2012 conference feedback

This questionnaire is for participants and observers of the 55th scientific conference for students of physics and nature sciences "Open Readings 2012"

Hb776t5
  1. You were participating in the "Open Readings" conference as: Required to answer
  2. Where are you from?
  3. How many times you have participated in "Open Readings" before? Required to answer
  4. What was your participation motivation? (select not more than 3 answers) Required to answer
  5. How would you evaluate conference activities? (1 - very bad; 5 - very good)
    did not attend 1 2 3 4 5
    Dr. Jean-luc Doumont "Structuring your research paper"
    Dalia Vasiliauskienė "How to give a good presentation"
    Oral Session O1
    Oral Session O2
    Oral Session O3
    Poster session P1
    Excursion
    Oral Session O4
    Oral Session O5
    Oral Session O6
    Poster session P2
    Conference party
    Nerijus Kochanskas "Under the dome of stars"
    Dr. Stanislava Bartašiūtė "What do we know about the universe?"
  6. Do you think that students' contributions should be refereed more strictly?
  7. If you were a presenter, did the number of attending lecturers/scientists satisfy you?
  8. How would you evaluate the organization of the conference? (1 - very bad; 5 - very good)
    no opinion/do not care 1 2 3 4 5
    Amount of information about the event before the conference and its availability
    Conference website
    Conference programme and following of it
    Conference abstract book
    Communication with the participants by e-mail/skype
    Amount of information about the event during the conference and its availability
    Accommodation in Vilnius University dormitories
    Quality of the organization in general
    Chairmans of oral sessions
  9. Please indicate the most significant shortcomings of conference organization
  10. Please indicate the most significant advantages of the organization and the conference in general
  11. What would be your suggestions for the organizing committee for Open Readings 2012 ?
  12. Are you going to participate in the next year's conference?
  13. Would you consider writing a "Open Readings" conference proceedings paper to a journ- factor smaller than 0,24 if there was such possibility?
  14. Was this questionnaire too long?