nowadays, robots are replacing manpower because they are much more accurate and faster. but at the same time, they are much more expensive and also increase unemployment. so in both cases, there are pros and cons. factories should make their decisions considering both aspects and according to the situation.
many people will lose their jobs.
dangerous.
not at all practical because robots do not have feelings and emotions.
replacing humans with robots has both positive and negative effects. the positive effect is that the accuracy of the work will definitely be high, and the time required to complete that particular work will be less or will be finished on time. the negative effect will definitely be borne by humans. if all factories start replacing humans with robots, then blue-collar workers will face financial problems and unemployment.
that's a good idea, but it leads to unemployment problems.
aa
i don't have much information about robotics. but i know that robotics helps people in factories, etc., in dealing with heavy equipment where one's life is at risk.
robots cannot replace humans in every task. they can be used for specialized risky tasks that take humans more time.
not suitable for all posts. it can be used for tasks that are risky and time-consuming for humans.
not agreeing
it is good up to a certain limit.
not okay
robots require electrical energy to perform tasks, while humans need human energy to be able to work for a certain period of time. robots require batteries to complete tasks on time.
the human will be lazy
cool computer, but rcoitobs? come on. this costs $250. killing a fly with a hand grenade. wtf? i'm wondering if it has *enough* cpu to do anything useful, and you're already implying it has *too much*? hate to break it to you, but rcoitobs will eat up all the cpu power you can throw at it. try doing vision, kinematics, motion planning, ai, etc. on-board a robot and see how far you get.