Star Trek ကို လူမှုရေးအခြေခံအရ ဘယ်လောက် အနီးကပ်ခံစားပါသလဲ?
not at all, the depicted humanity is far too utopian, the tolerance of non-aliens is naive
well... a lot is desirable, but there's still a long way to go... but discourse ethics a la picard for the win.
unfortunately still too far away.
at most to a certain extent, if at all, unfortunately our reality is still very far from the star trek utopia of a united humanity.
community. there is still much to achieve (keyword: tolerance, equality, etc.).
uvdq2q
still far too far away - unfortunately!
as a role model
very far away. society seems to be regressing at the moment.
not so far away, if i scale it down to a planet and take the eu, for example, as a federation.
we are still very far from that.
star trek managed to incorporate, reflect, and question the prevailing social conventions of its time, as well as to present a "better" future. for example: the original series, filmed from 1966 to 1969. in the midst of the cold war, there is a russian officer on the spaceship! furthermore, a woman - and a black woman at that! (equality for women and african americans was still in its early stages back then) are on the bridge, and for the first time on tv, a white man kissed a black woman! star trek, like other series, questioned current events. discrimination and other issues of daily life were addressed and "discussed" there.
not very close. it is more of a social utopia.
close, but too "superficial" in some aspects.
partially
utopian
unlikely
utopian
not very close
interesting
thinkable
close to reality
unrealistic
not at all
it's still a long way to go
utopian
very close
very close
relatively close
the most realistic of all science fiction series
utopia
there will always be war.
unfortunately hardly
as a possible case study
fail
very close
far away
fern
very close
unfortunately too far
very close
near
so-so
far away
another long way
2 out of 5
unrealistic
very far away
thinkable
relatively far away in relation to the federation.
near
to indicate the way
very far
very close
far away
questionable
few discrepancies
the utopia of the federation is desirable
partly
fern
no will never be anything
near
not very close
far away
fern
the usa would never be admitted to the federation.
quite far
0 out of 5
medium
rather not so
good representation of different cultures
-
very far
medium
hard to imagine
not very close
far away
unfortunately still light-years away.
unfortunately, we are still far from the ideal star trek society.
far away
fern
sometimes a utopia and then again a dystopia. i can't decide, and it depends on the series...
still far away
utopian
in the past, i considered it relatively close, but now i unfortunately see star trek only as a beautiful, idealistic utopia that is very far from reality.
there are many good approaches, such as regarding data's rights as an individual. however, in episodes shorter than an hour, it is naturally very limited what can be included that reflects reality. i think it's good that a lot is shown about the personalities of the characters, which makes the series feel very human.
in terms of what is humanly possible: close; in terms of how our current society is structured: low.
star trek should only be seen as a utopian vision.
unfortunately, not very close.
utopia
very far away
many current issues are addressed and solutions are presented,
it depends on the star trek series. ;-)
not so big...
i would also evaluate the different series differently here. tos is somewhat like "the 60s of the future," tng is too lofty, ds9 is sometimes almost too dark, voy is indefinable... and ent is simply adapted a bit to our reality again (just look at the 3rd season), but it unmistakably carries the "spirit of star trek."