यी जानकारीहरूमा, के त्यहाँ पूर्वाग्रहहरू छन्, तपाईंको अनुसार? यदि हो भने, कुन?
no
no, stereotypes should not be neglected.
no
no stereotypes
no
none
no
we should define more precisely what we mean by stereotypes. here, socially shared opinions regarding different characteristics of a language: its beauty or ugliness, its level of difficulty, its poetry...? i would say that the points concerning the difficulty of lithuanian and its lexical proximity to russian were stereotypes.
i heard things like 'this language is useless, only spoken in russia' - wrong. 'they (russian people) would pay you a lot for you to speak their language' - wrong, more and more are speaking english and even french, but it is true that they pay a lot for any service you provide them.
no
no
english is easy.
that french is a very artful and beautifully sounding language, but it is not.
before i heard that they are hard to learn, but i found them more interesting than difficult.
the grammar is horribly difficult. writing it is really difficult.
yes: "it's too hard for foreigners to learn this language" or "it is easier than french."
many exceptions to the rules
won't need the language
beautiful, wild & romantic, cute
that bulgarian is the same as russian, that it's a very harsh language...
no
no.
i think that the french language has tons of stereotypes, such as people who speak it being too fancy, cocky, even arrogant. it's the language of the upper class, therefore a french-speaking person allows themselves to feel superior to others and so on.
i don't know about any.
sounds very nice, like singing.
it sounds like frogs.
about the difference between portuguese and brazilian portuguese.
yes, of course. but i didn't want to consider what people said because i want to build my own opinion.
stereotypes: it's a language for rude people; it's not an elaborate language.