टर्कीका राष्ट्रपति रजब तैय्यिप एर्दोगानको 2023 को चुनावको पूर्व धारणाहरू

erdogan's leadership style has faced criticism regarding the state of democracy and human rights in turkey. critics argue that erdogan's government has curtailed media freedom, suppressed dissent, and undermined democratic institutions. there have been concerns raised about the erosion of the rule of law and judicial independence. these policies have drawn international criticism and affected turkey's reputation in terms of human rights and democratic governance.

his leadership negatively impacted every aspect. education, social life, tourism, healthcare, and unemployment increased, and it literally messed everything up.

erdogan's leadership style has had a significant impact on both turkey's domestic and foreign policies. domestically, erdogan's style is characterized by a mix of authoritarianism, populism, and islamic conservatism. he has been accused of cracking down on political opposition and suppressing freedom of speech, particularly in the aftermath of the failed coup attempt in 2016. erdogan has also promoted a more islamic identity for turkey and has sought to increase the role of religion in public life.

centralization of power: erdogan has taken steps to centralize power in turkey, consolidating control over key institutions such as the judiciary and the media. this has led to concerns about the erosion of democratic values and civil liberties in the country. economic policies: erdogan has pursued a number of economic policies aimed at promoting growth and modernization, including large-scale infrastructure projects and an emphasis on exports. however, some critics have argued that these policies have also contributed to a widening wealth gap and increased inequality in the country.

domestically, erdogan's leadership style has been characterized by a strong centralization of power. he has consolidated power in the presidency, increasing its authority over the executive branch and the judiciary.

domestically, erdogan's leadership style has led to a more centralized and authoritarian governing structure. he has made attempts to undermine democratic institutions such as the judiciary, the media, and civil society groups, while also consolidating authority in the presidency. this has raised concerns in turkey about the deterioration of democratic principles and the rule of law.

probably either made it better or worse? ******** there is no question added for me to give you feedback on your questionnaire and you did not submit the responses on moodle! in terms of the questionnaire, there are some issues. firstly, the age range has overlapping values. if a person is 22, should they choose 18-22 or 22-25? it looks like you copied my example from the board of what not to do... :) later, in the question about gender, you have some grammar issues (e.g. a person cannot be plural 'women', a singular 'woman' should be used instead). other questions are based on trusting that the person actually knows about the recent political events and situations in turkey.

no idea

sometimes he is aggressive, i guess.

until 2012, turkey had a friendly impression of the eu and the us. however, after that, erdogan began to think that european government leaders were trying to politicize against him, and he also believed that european leaders were supporting terrorism. erdogan's popularity increased in turkey because the opposition in turkey is terrible. the citizens of turkey understood that there is no one better than erdogan for turkey. for me, i don't like erdogan, but i don't think erdogan's opponent will win the election.