උක්රේනය-රුසියාව අතර ගැටුම පිළිබඳ තොරතුරු ප්‍රසාරය සහ ජනතාවගේ ප්‍රතිචාරය සමාජ මාධ්‍යයේ
ආයුබෝවන්, මගේ නම Augustinas. මම කවුනස් තාක්ෂණ විශ්වවිද්‍යාලයේ නව මාධ්‍ය භාෂා අධ්‍යයන වැඩසටහනේ දෙවන වසරේ ශිෂ්‍යයෙකි. මම සමාජ මාධ්‍යයේ ධාවනය වන උක්රේනය-රුසියාව අතර ගැටුම පිළිබඳ තොරතුරු ප්‍රසාරය, ගැටුම පිළිබඳ ජනතාවගේ අදහස සහ සමාජ මාධ්‍ය වේදිකාවල මිනිසුන් කියවන හෝ දැකීමේ තොරතුරු වල විශ්වාසනීයතාවය පිළිබඳ පර්යේෂණයක් සිදු කරමින් සිටිමි.
මෙම සමීක්ෂණය සම්පූර්ණ කිරීමට මිනිත්තු 2-4ක් ගත වේ. ඔබට ඉතා සත්‍ය ලෙස ප්‍රශ්නාවලියට පිළිතුරු දීමට මම උද්යෝගිමත් කරමි, මන්ද සමීක්ෂණයට ලබා දෙන ප්‍රතිචාර 100% අනානෝමස් වේ.
මෙම සමීක්ෂණය පිළිබඳ කිසිදු ප්‍රශ්න, අදහස් හෝ කණගාටුම් ඇත්නම්, කරුණාකර මට සම්බන්ධ වන්න: [email protected]
ඔබගේ සහභාගීත්වය සඳහා ඔබට බොහෝම ස්තූතියි.
ඔබගේ වයස් කාණ්ඩය කුමක්ද?
ග්‍රාෆ්
වගුව
ඔබගේ ලිංගය කුමක්ද?
ග්‍රාෆ්
වගුව
ඔබගේ වර්තමාන අධ්‍යාපන මට්ටම කුමක්ද?
ග්‍රාෆ්
වගුව
ඔබ උක්රේනයේ ධාවනය වන ගැටුමේ සිදුවීම් පිළිබඳ කී දුරක් නිරීක්ෂණය කරයිද?
ග්‍රාෆ්
වගුව
ඔබ සාමාන්‍යයෙන් ගැටුමේ ධාවනය වන සිදුවීම් පිළිබඳ කුමන පුවත්/සමාජ මාධ්‍ය වේදිකාවන්හි අසා/පසුබැසෙන්නෙද?
ග්‍රාෆ්
වගුව
අනෙකුත්
- telegram
- online newspapers, podcasts
- my mom tells me.
- radio
- internet news sites, such as al jazeera, wionews, google news, etc.
- discord
ඔngoing ගැටුම පිළිබඳ සමාජ මාධ්‍ය වේදිකාවන්හි තොරතුරු පිළිබඳ ඔබට කී දුරක් විශ්වාසද, 1 සිට 10 දක්වා මට්ටමකින්?
ග්‍රාෆ්
වගුව
ඔබ එම ප්‍රශ්නයට එම ප්‍රමාණය ලබා දුන්නේ ඇයි?
- because i never trust the media 100%.
- it is true what i see.
- because social media channels can post whatever they want. they can display the sources, but even those can sometimes be false or incorrect.
- it's always difficult to separate the truth from statements.
- because the sources i follow are legitimate, official news services in lithuania.
- because i don't really follow the conflict so closely, i don't fully trust it until i see multiple reports on the same situation.
- because the "western" media is also guilty of propaganda, whether you hate it or like it, nothing is 100% true.
- i chose a higher rate because the main source of information for me on this topic is certain people whom i trust as reliable sources. however, there are also many other sources that people do not follow, and they still appear in their feed, which i evaluate critically.
- there is some misinformation.
- i trust most of the news about the war, but sometimes i find myself believing in some russian propaganda because it was written on the news portal.
ඔබට මෙම ගැටුම පිළිබඳ සමාජ මාධ්‍යයේ දැක්මට ලැබෙන අදහස් කුමක්ද?
- that ukraine is the victim and they fight for their right to be independent. and russia is an aggressor.
- ukraine victory
- most of the people i see on social media are supporting the ukrainians. however, if you dig deeper, you can find a lot of russian propaganda, especially on a platform like twitter.
- mostly negative.
- either pro-russian or pro-ukrainian. maybe neutral-sided too.
- mostly that ukraine survives solely on nato support.
- a lot of controversial opinions, but a lot of true ones too.
- support for ukraine
- pro-ukrainian or anti-beast
- mostly - really bad thoughts about russia and the russian language.
ඔබගේ මෙම ගැටුම පිළිබඳ ස්ථානය කුමක්ද?
ග්‍රාෆ්
වගුව
ඉහත ප්‍රශ්නයේ ඔබ තෝරා ගත් විශේෂිත විකල්පය ඇයි?
- because i support ukraine's right to be an independent state
- i can think of how i can trust.
- ukrainians were attacked without any real motive that could objectively be considered viable. the russians are committing many war crimes against the innocent people of ukraine.
- aggression towards ukraine is aggression towards europe.
- because it is the right option.
- because after the war, ukraine is going to be in massive debt, and the russian people are manipulated by the few who are in control. neither russians nor ukrainians should be involved in it.
- because russia is still the aggressor, and killing innocent people, bombing schools, hospitals, and apartment buildings can never be justified.
- because it was a russian invasion of a free country, historical similarities to lithuania
- this invasion is not human.
- i don't have to comment; the facts speak for themselves.
උ ongoing ගැටුම ඔබගේ උක්රේනය සහ රුසියාව පිළිබඳ අදහසට බලපෑම්/වෙනස්කම් සිදු කර තිබේද? ඔව් නම්, කෙසේද? නැත්නම්, ඇයි?
- no
- russia shows how strong she is, and now we can see how truly strong she is, and russia never tells the truth.
- ever since the events in 2013 in ukraine and the occupation of crimea, it was clear to me and many others that russia is extremely unstable and should not be trusted. the recent events just solidify that statement. as for ukraine, it only showed how powerful the country and its people are.
- it hasn't changed. my stance on the russian government has always been negative.
- ukraine is a very strong country with a great president as well. a true leader. when it comes to russia, it has only revealed its evil ambitions. i hope ukraine can push out the invaders one way or another and rebuild its infrastructure. it is a tragedy, and it is happening not far from lithuania. a war for no logical reason at all.
- not really, it just shows the massive corruption that russia has.
- yes, it did. of course, russia has never been our friend, but to me, that country at this point is below ground level. the way they just attacked their so-called "brothers," the ukrainians, seems inhuman. so i would say that my view of russia has changed in a really bad way, but ukraine has shown what a great brotherly land it is. the way they are standing up for themselves is something incredible. a lot of countries should learn from the ukrainians.
- i have always evaluated russian politics critically, but now not just politics, but the whole culture seems inhumane to me. my respect for ukraine and ukrainians has also grown a lot.
- no, i have always thought of russia as a corrupt country with little to no people, only brainwashed robots.
- yes, because i wanted to learn russian, now i want to learn ukrainian.