2 یان 4 کۆرە پڕۆسەسۆر؟
پەڕەی توێژینەوە
کەسێکی پڕۆسەسۆر کە تۆ بەکاردهێنی؟
کەسێکی پڕۆسەسۆر کە تۆ زۆرتر پێویستت بێت؟
تکایە، بەرەوپێشەوە بڵێن بۆچی تەنها ئەم کەسە پڕۆسەسۆرە پێویستت بێت
- fast, good performance
- i use it for my audio workstation. experts say intel is more powerful for that.
- because i like how it works and it suits my needs
- s
- i have been using it and i am satisfied with it.
- because my shop owner, who is very reliable, is saying that intel is very good.
- popular
- intel offers the most cutting-edge technologies, suitable for my calculation needs; it has never failed me.
- it is less expensive and performance is not visibly worse.
- i don't know.
چند کۆرە لە CPUی کۆمپیوتەرەکەت هەیە؟
تۆ راضیی لە ئەم ئامرازە لە هەموو بنچمارکەکان؟
تۆ لەسەر فکری کڕینی 4 کۆرە پڕۆسەسۆری AMD یان Intel؟
بۆچی؟ (تکایە، بەرەوپێشەوە بڵێن پرسیار ژمارە 6)
- no idea
- because i have a 6-core processor with me right now. why go for 4? lol
- for further use and improvement
- yes
- for quick processing
- calculations on dual core take too long.
- the computer will work faster, and it will be perfect for windows vista ;)
- 2 cores are enough for me.
- because i am satisfied with my own.
- faster..
جیاوازی سەرەکی نێوان پڕۆسەسۆرەکانی AMD و Intel 4 کۆرە چەندە؟
- no idea
- amd es muy lento.
- amd is great for gamers and video editing and stuff.
- i don't know.
- yes
- i don't know much, but maybe the processing speed and efficiency differ in both processors.
- don't know
- don't know
- maintenance costs.
- amd is cheaper, but generates more heat.