Ma rast e ku ji xwedîyên malan re bibe pêdivî ye ku ji bo pergala avakirinê ya berdewam (gavanên kesk, xweşbûnê, havzanên avê baran) para bidin, bê her curek beşdariyê?
no
people who are not aware of the costs of living near the water or simply haven't informed themselves about future costs should receive assistance. if the costs are too high, they should receive support to relocate.
yes.
no, that is not fair. when you give them eur 10.00 - eur 15.00 for every square meter of impervious surface, the government saves a lot of money, especially related to the european water framework directive.
yes, it is okay for the homeowners to pay some of it, but the government has to help.
if you cut off the water from the sewage system, a good motivation factor could be to pay a percentage of the sewage tax back to the individual household. this has been introduced in copenhagen and is currently causing a lot of investments in sustainable drainage. so i would suggest that it would be fair to refund a share of the sewage tax.
i don't think it's fair that only some citizens should pay for a preventive action that is not solely caused by them. it should be a collective effort.
yes. the tech is available.
over a longer timespan, yes. but as a first-time investment, no. maybe provide some funding for those willing to contribute some themselves.
yes, to some extent, but it is not realistic. there should be some nice advantages to doing so and a legal requirement.