खुला पठन २०११ सम्मेलनको फिडब्याक प्रश्नावली

यो प्रश्नावली भौतिकी र प्रकृति विज्ञानका विद्यार्थीहरूको ५४ औं वैज्ञानिक सम्मेलनका सहभागी र पर्यवेक्षकहरूको लागि हो "खुला पठन २०११"
खुला पठन २०११ सम्मेलनको फिडब्याक प्रश्नावली

तपाईं "खुला पठन" सम्मेलनमा निम्न रूपमा सहभागी हुनुहुन्थ्यो:

तपाईं कहाँका हुनुहुन्छ?

तपाईंले "खुला पठन" मा कति पटक सहभागी हुनुभएको छ?

तपाईंको सहभागिताको प्रेरणा के थियो? (३ भन्दा बढी उत्तर चयन नगर्नुहोस्)

तपाईं सम्मेलन गतिविधिहरूलाई कसरी मूल्यांकन गर्नुहुन्छ? (१ - धेरै खराब; ५ - धेरै राम्रो)

के तपाईंलाई लाग्छ कि विद्यार्थीहरूको योगदानलाई बढी कडाइका साथ समीक्षा गर्नुपर्छ?

तपाईं सम्मेलनको सामग्रीको वैज्ञानिक गुणस्तरको बारेमा के सोच्नुहुन्छ?

यदि तपाईं प्रस्तुतकर्ता हुनुहुन्थ्यो भने, उपस्थित व्याख्याताहरू/वैज्ञानिकहरूको संख्या तपाईंलाई सन्तोषजनक लाग्यो?

यदि तपाईंले अघिल्लो प्रश्नमा "होइन" भनेको छ भने, विद्यार्थीहरूको अनुसन्धानमा व्याख्याताहरूलाई बढी चासो दिलाउनका लागि तपाईं के उपायहरू प्रस्ताव गर्न सक्नुहुन्छ?

  1. no
  2. perhaps taking action to improve the quality of presentations and research in general would be beneficial.
  3. perhaps it would make sense to email the lecturers the program?
  4. poster presentations should be divided into groups based on relevant fields. i believe this way it would be easier for interested readers to find posters that interest them.

तपाईं सम्मेलनको संगठनलाई कसरी मूल्यांकन गर्नुहुन्छ? (१ - धेरै खराब; ५ - धेरै राम्रो)

कृपया सम्मेलनको संगठनका सबैभन्दा महत्त्वपूर्ण कमीहरूलाई जनाउनुहोस्

  1. nothing
  2. no
  3. no
  4. i could improve my knowledge by attending such a session.
  5. i could meet many well-known dignitaries.
  6. dormitories - i haven't seen anything worse in my life! i thought that lithuania was in the eu... the lack of coffee breaks is a shame. everyone from abroad was shocked...
  7. haven't noticed any.
  8. i did not see any major shortcomings.
  9. there was no lunch organized for participants.
  10. -
…थप…

कृपया संगठन र सम्मेलनका सबैभन्दा महत्त्वपूर्ण फाइदाहरूलाई जनाउनुहोस्

  1. everything
  2. no
  3. no
  4. this organization helps people like me to upgrade my knowledge by conducting such events.
  5. it increased my interest to do even better.
  6. visiting vilnius and nothing else.
  7. everything was really well organized. and i must say it was a very high-level scientific conference this year, i think.
  8. the poster session was better organized than last year - no hanging posters on the walls.
  9. -
  10. internationality
…थप…

What would be your suggestions for the organizing committee for Open Readings 2012 ?

  1. no
  2. no
  3. no
  4. nil
  5. all the best..no suggestions
  6. 1. should be a fee. 2. should be a coffee break (you would have money for coffee break). 3. conference party should be a party in a club, for example, we are young! 4. do something with accommodation, conditions were like in poor africa. as i said, a fee will solve all your problems...
  7. broadening the conference to a higher level, not just for students, i mean.
  8. it is hard to suggest something specific, but in general, it would be nice to do something about increasing the number of scientists and lecturers present during the oral presentation.
  9. -
  10. make the organizing committee larger.
…थप…

Are you going to participate in the next year's conference?

Would you consider writing a "Open Readings" conference proceedings paper to a journal with impact factor smaller than 0,4 if there was such possibility?

Would you be able to prepare your abstract in TeX/LaTeX/LYX for the next year's conference?

Was this questionnaire too long?

आफ्नो प्रश्नावली सिर्जना गर्नुहोस्यस प्रश्नावलीमा जवाफ दिनुहोस्