پەیوەندیدانی کۆنفرانسی "خەونەکان 2011" بەرەوپێشەوە
ئەم پەیوەندیدانە بۆ بەشداربووان و سەیرکەرانە بۆ کۆنفرانسی زانستی 54ی بەرەوپێشەوە بۆ خوێندکارانی فیزیک و زانستە نەتورەکان "خەونەکان 2011"
تۆ لە کۆنفرانسی "خەونەکان" بە شێوەیەکی خۆت بەشداربووە:
تۆ لە کەیە؟
چند جار لە "خەونەکان" پێشتر بەشداربووە؟
چی بەرەوپێشەوەی تۆ بەرەوپێشەوەیە؟ (بە شێوەیەکی زۆر لە 3 وەڵامەکان هەڵبژێر)
How would you evaluate conference activities? (1 - very bad; 5 - very good)
Do you think that students' contributions should be refereed more strictly?
What do you think about the scientific quality of the conference content?
If you were a presenter, did the number of attending lecturers/scientists satisfy you?
If you anwered "no" in the previous question, what means of making the lecturers more interested in students' researches you could offer?
- no
- perhaps taking action to improve the quality of presentations and research in general would be beneficial.
- perhaps it would make sense to email the lecturers the program?
- poster presentations should be divided into groups based on relevant fields. i believe this way it would be easier for interested readers to find posters that interest them.
How would you evaluate the organization of the conference? (1 - very bad; 5 - very good)
Please indicate the most significant shortcomings of conference organization
- nothing
- no
- no
- i could improve my knowledge by attending such a session.
- i could meet many well-known dignitaries.
- dormitories - i haven't seen anything worse in my life! i thought that lithuania was in the eu... the lack of coffee breaks is a shame. everyone from abroad was shocked...
- haven't noticed any.
- i did not see any major shortcomings.
- there was no lunch organized for participants.
- -
Please indicate the most significant advantages of the organization and the conference in general
- everything
- no
- no
- this organization helps people like me to upgrade my knowledge by conducting such events.
- it increased my interest to do even better.
- visiting vilnius and nothing else.
- everything was really well organized. and i must say it was a very high-level scientific conference this year, i think.
- the poster session was better organized than last year - no hanging posters on the walls.
- -
- internationality
What would be your suggestions for the organizing committee for Open Readings 2012 ?
- no
- no
- no
- nil
- all the best..no suggestions
- 1. should be a fee. 2. should be a coffee break (you would have money for coffee break). 3. conference party should be a party in a club, for example, we are young! 4. do something with accommodation, conditions were like in poor africa. as i said, a fee will solve all your problems...
- broadening the conference to a higher level, not just for students, i mean.
- it is hard to suggest something specific, but in general, it would be nice to do something about increasing the number of scientists and lecturers present during the oral presentation.
- -
- make the organizing committee larger.