پەیوەندیدانی کۆنفرانسی "خەونەکان 2011" بەرەوپێشەوە

ئەم پەیوەندیدانە بۆ بەشداربووان و سەیرکەرانە بۆ کۆنفرانسی زانستی 54ی بەرەوپێشەوە بۆ خوێندکارانی فیزیک و زانستە نەتورەکان "خەونەکان 2011"
پەیوەندیدانی کۆنفرانسی "خەونەکان 2011" بەرەوپێشەوە
Encama ankêtê giştî ye

تۆ لە کۆنفرانسی "خەونەکان" بە شێوەیەکی خۆت بەشداربووە: ✪

تۆ لە کەیە؟

چند جار لە "خەونەکان" پێشتر بەشداربووە؟ ✪

چی بەرەوپێشەوەی تۆ بەرەوپێشەوەیە؟ (بە شێوەیەکی زۆر لە 3 وەڵامەکان هەڵبژێر) ✪

How would you evaluate conference activities? (1 - very bad; 5 - very good)

did not attend12345
Oral Session I
Oral Session II
Oral Session III
Oral Session IV
Oral Session V
Poster session
Excursion
Conference party
Lecture of prof. G. Tamulaitis ("Currend Trends of Semiconductor Physics")
Lecture of prof. S. Juršėnas ("Understanding of Living Systems")

Do you think that students' contributions should be refereed more strictly?

What do you think about the scientific quality of the conference content?

If you were a presenter, did the number of attending lecturers/scientists satisfy you?

If you anwered "no" in the previous question, what means of making the lecturers more interested in students' researches you could offer?

How would you evaluate the organization of the conference? (1 - very bad; 5 - very good)

no opinion/do not care12345
Amount of information about the event before the conference and its availability
Conference website
Conference programme and following of it
Conference abstract book
Communication with the participants by e-mail/skype
Amount of information about the event during the conference and its availability
Accommodation in Vilnius University dormitories
Quality of the organization in general
Chairmans of oral sessions

Please indicate the most significant shortcomings of conference organization

Please indicate the most significant advantages of the organization and the conference in general

What would be your suggestions for the organizing committee for Open Readings 2012 ?

Are you going to participate in the next year's conference?

Would you consider writing a "Open Readings" conference proceedings paper to a journal with impact factor smaller than 0,4 if there was such possibility?

Would you be able to prepare your abstract in TeX/LaTeX/LYX for the next year's conference?

Was this questionnaire too long?