OPEN READINGS 2011 conference feedback questionnaire

This questionnaire is for participants and observers of the 54th scientific conference for students of physics and nature sciences "Open Readings 2011"
OPEN READINGS 2011 conference feedback questionnaire

You were participating in the "Open Readings" conference as:

Where are you from?

How many times you have participated in "Open Readings" before?

What was your participation motivation? (select not more than 3 answers)

How would you evaluate conference activities? (1 - very bad; 5 - very good)

Do you think that students' contributions should be refereed more strictly?

What do you think about the scientific quality of the conference content?

If you were a presenter, did the number of attending lecturers/scientists satisfy you?

If you anwered "no" in the previous question, what means of making the lecturers more interested in students' researches you could offer?

  1. no
  2. perhaps taking action to improve the quality of presentations and research in general would be beneficial.
  3. perhaps it would make sense to email the lecturers the program?
  4. poster presentations should be divided into groups based on relevant fields. i believe this way it would be easier for interested readers to find posters that interest them.

How would you evaluate the organization of the conference? (1 - very bad; 5 - very good)

Please indicate the most significant shortcomings of conference organization

  1. nothing
  2. no
  3. no
  4. i could improve my knowledge by attending such a session.
  5. i could meet many well-known dignitaries.
  6. dormitories - i haven't seen anything worse in my life! i thought that lithuania was in the eu... the lack of coffee breaks is a shame. everyone from abroad was shocked...
  7. haven't noticed any.
  8. i did not see any major shortcomings.
  9. there was no lunch organized for participants.
  10. -
…More…

Please indicate the most significant advantages of the organization and the conference in general

  1. everything
  2. no
  3. no
  4. this organization helps people like me to upgrade my knowledge by conducting such events.
  5. it increased my interest to do even better.
  6. visiting vilnius and nothing else.
  7. everything was really well organized. and i must say it was a very high-level scientific conference this year, i think.
  8. the poster session was better organized than last year - no hanging posters on the walls.
  9. -
  10. internationality
…More…

What would be your suggestions for the organizing committee for Open Readings 2012 ?

  1. no
  2. no
  3. no
  4. nil
  5. all the best..no suggestions
  6. 1. should be a fee. 2. should be a coffee break (you would have money for coffee break). 3. conference party should be a party in a club, for example, we are young! 4. do something with accommodation, conditions were like in poor africa. as i said, a fee will solve all your problems...
  7. broadening the conference to a higher level, not just for students, i mean.
  8. it is hard to suggest something specific, but in general, it would be nice to do something about increasing the number of scientists and lecturers present during the oral presentation.
  9. -
  10. make the organizing committee larger.
…More…

Are you going to participate in the next year's conference?

Would you consider writing a "Open Readings" conference proceedings paper to a journal with impact factor smaller than 0,4 if there was such possibility?

Would you be able to prepare your abstract in TeX/LaTeX/LYX for the next year's conference?

Was this questionnaire too long?

Create your questionnaireAnswer this form