Home
Public
Sign in
Register
56
ago more than 13y
Tags
science
openreadings
Report
Reported
OPEN READINGS 2011 conference feedback questionnaire
This questionnaire is for participants and observers of the 54th scientific conference for students of physics and nature sciences "Open Readings 2011"
Questionnaire results are publicly available
You were participating in the "Open Readings" conference as:
✪
Presenter (of an oral presentation or a poster)
Observer, not a student
Observer, student
Where are you from?
Lithuania
Latvia
Belarus
Poland
Estonia
other country
How many times you have participated in "Open Readings" before?
✪
It was my first "Open Readings" conference
One
Two
Three or more
What was your participation motivation? (select not more than 3 answers)
✪
Gain experience in presenting my work in scientific conferences
Gain extra points for applying to master's studies
Start new collaborations with other conference participants or lecturers
Listen to the lectures of invited speakers
Listen to my colleague's presentation
Have fun in the conference party, excursion, etc.
I am just curious about the scientific activity of young students
My scientific coordinator forced me to participate
I was an organizer or a session chairman for the conference
Visit Vilnius
I did not even question my motivation
Other
How would you evaluate conference activities? (1 - very bad; 5 - very good)
did not attend
1
2
3
4
5
Oral Session I
Oral Session II
Oral Session III
Oral Session IV
Oral Session V
Poster session
Excursion
Conference party
Lecture of prof. G. Tamulaitis ("Currend Trends of Semiconductor Physics")
Lecture of prof. S. Juršėnas ("Understanding of Living Systems")
Do you think that students' contributions should be refereed more strictly?
Yes
No
I have no opinion of this question
What do you think about the scientific quality of the conference content?
The quality was good enough
The quality was poor, but one can do nothing for this to change
The quality was poor and the contributions should be filtered by the referees
I have no opinion of this question
If you were a presenter, did the number of attending lecturers/scientists satisfy you?
Yes
No
If you anwered "no" in the previous question, what means of making the lecturers more interested in students' researches you could offer?
How would you evaluate the organization of the conference? (1 - very bad; 5 - very good)
no opinion/do not care
1
2
3
4
5
Amount of information about the event before the conference and its availability
Conference website
Conference programme and following of it
Conference abstract book
Communication with the participants by e-mail/skype
Amount of information about the event during the conference and its availability
Accommodation in Vilnius University dormitories
Quality of the organization in general
Chairmans of oral sessions
Please indicate the most significant shortcomings of conference organization
Please indicate the most significant advantages of the organization and the conference in general
What would be your suggestions for the organizing committee for Open Readings 2012 ?
Are you going to participate in the next year's conference?
Yes
No
I do not know
Would you consider writing a "Open Readings" conference proceedings paper to a journal with impact factor smaller than 0,4 if there was such possibility?
Yes, for sure
Maybe
No, definitely
I don't know
Would you be able to prepare your abstract in TeX/LaTeX/LYX for the next year's conference?
Sure, I'm able to work with TeX
No, I don't know what TeX is
It would be troublesome
Was this questionnaire too long?
Yes
No
Submit answer
